مدیریت زنجیره ارزش راهبردی

مدیریت زنجیره ارزش راهبردی

تحلیل جامع سیستم مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار صنایع با دلفی فازی، آنتروپی و کوپراس

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
استادیار گروه مدیریت، دانشکده مدیریت و حسابداری، دانشگاه بوعلی‌سینا، همدان، ایران؛ m.ajalli@basu.ac.ir
10.22075/svcm.2026.39907.1076
چکیده
امروزه پایداری هر سیستمی در هر صنعتی، تبدیل به یکی از راهبردهای کلیدی شده است. آرمان نهایی پایداری، بهبود مسائل محیط‌زیستی، اقتصادی و اجتماعی و سایر بهبودهای فرآیندی است. تولید سرب و روی همواره با آلاینده‌های محیط‌زیستی بسیاری همراه است و کاهش مسائل آلودگی این صنعت اجتناب‌نا‌پذیر است. لذا برنامه‌ریزی برای بهبود پایداری در سیستم زنجیره تأمین این صنعت از ضروریات است. تحقیق حاضر با درک ضرورت این اقدامات به تحلیل جامع مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار صنعت سرب و روی به عنوان یکی از صنایع ملی و تأثیرگذار در بهبود روند اقتصادی کشور پرداخته است. روش تحقیق از لحاظ "هدف، منبع گردآوری داده‌ها، مکان و زمان جمع‌آوری داده‌ها و توع داده" از نوع "کاربردی، اولیه، میدانی- مقطعی و آمیخته" است. جامعه آماری شامل خبرگان صنعت هستند که با روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند از عقاید 60 خبره در بخش شناسایی عوامل تأثیرگذار بر مدیریت زنجیره تأمین پایدار و به تعداد 30 متخصص در بخش ارزیابی عوامل و رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان پایدار صنعت استفاده شده است. روش‌های مورداستفاده برای شناسایی، ارزیابی عوامل و تأمین‌کنندگان به ترتیب دلفی فازی، آنتروپی شانون و کوپراس است. تحلیل دلفی نشان داد که هفت عامل کلیدی از اثربخشی بالایی در صنعت برخوردارند. خروجی آنتروپی نشان داد که شاخص "اجتماعی" در اولویت اول؛ و شاخص‌های "نظارتی و قانونی"، "اقتصادی" و "محیط‌زیستی" در اولویت‌های دوم تا چهارم قرار دارند. همچنین نتیجه کوپراس نشان داد که تأمین‌کنندگان پنجم، ششم و دوم به ترتیب در رتبه‌های اول تا سوم جای می‌گیرند. در انتها، پیشنهادهای کاربردی و تحقیقاتی به صنعت و محققان ارائه شدند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Comprehensive analysis of sustainable industrial supply chain management system with Fuzzy Delphi, Entropy and COPRAS

نویسنده English

Mehdi Ajalli
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, Faculty of Management and Accounting, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran; m.ajalli@basu.ac.ir
چکیده English

Today, the sustainability of any system in any industry has become one of the key strategies. The ultimate goal of sustainability is to improve environmental, economic, and social issues and other process improvements. Meanwhile, lead and zinc production is always accompanied by many environmental pollutants, and reducing pollution issues in this industry is inevitable. Therefore, planning to improve sustainability in the supply chain system of this industry is essential. Understanding the necessity of these measures, the present study has comprehensively evaluated the sustainable suppliers of the lead and zinc industry as one of the national industries and influential in improving the country's economic trend. The study method is "applied, primary, field-cross-sectional, and mixed" in terms of "purpose, data collection source, place and time of data collection, and data type". The statistical population includes industry experts who were used with a purposive sampling method from the opinions of 60 experts in the section of identifying factors affecting sustainable supply chain management and 30 experts in the section of evaluating factors and ranking sustainable suppliers of the industry. The methods used to identify and evaluate factors and suppliers are Fuzzy Delphi, Shannon Entropy and COPRAS, respectively. The Delphi analysis showed that seven key factors have high effectiveness in the industry. The entropy output indicates that the "social" index is in the first priority; and the "supervisory and legal", "economic" and "environmental" indices are in the second to fourth priorities. The COPRAS result also showed that the fifth, sixth and second suppliers are in the first to third ranks, respectively. Finally, practical and research suggestions were presented to the industry and researchers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Environment
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Suppliers
Lead and Zinc Industry
Fuzzy Delphi
Entropy
COPRAS
ابراهیم‌پور سامانی، جمشید؛ خانی، ناصر؛ یزدانی، بیتا؛ داودی، سید محمدرضا (1403). طراحی مدل پایدار زنجیره تأمین در صنایع غذایی و کشاورزی با تأکید بر ابعاد اقتصادی، اجتماعی، زیست‌محیطی: کاربرد روش مدل‌سازی ساختاری تفسیری. مدیریت زنجیره تأمین. 26(84). 77-102.
ابراهیم‌پور سامانی، جمشید؛ داودی، سید محمدرضا (1404). شناسایی و اولویت‌بندی شاخص‌های کلیدی در زنجیره تأمین پایدار مواد غذایی با تکنیک دیمتل فازی. اقتصاد کشاورزی و توسعه. (انتشار آنلاین از 16 شهریور 1404).
اجلی، مهدی (a1403). ارزیابی معیارهای توسعه مواد و صنایع معدنی با پتانسیل بالا بر پایه زنجیره ارزش با استفاده از روش تحلیل نسبت ارزیابی وزند‌هی ترجیحی. فصلنامه علمی مدیریت استاندارد و کیفیت. 14(3). 101-121.
 doi: 10.22034/jsqm.2025.472534.1597.
اجلی، مهدی و عظیمی، حسین (b1403). طراحی مدل پیاده‌سازی نظام آراستگی S5 در صنعت روی با ترکیب سوارا، دلفی و مورا. فصلنامه علمی مدیریت استاندارد و کیفیت. 13(4). 33-64. doi: 10.22034/jsqm.2024.399105.1497.
اجلی، مهدی؛ زینتی، بابک؛ صابری‌فرد، نیما (1401). رتبه‌بندی تأمین‌کنندگان ناب صنعت خودرو با تکنیک ارزیابی نسبت افزودنی، نشریه علمی اندیشه آماد، دوره 21، شماره 81، شماره پیاپی 21، شهریور، صفحه 94-71.
خانی، ناصر؛ ابراهیم‌پور سامانی، جمشید (1402). شاخص‌های مؤثر بر زنجیره تأمین پایدار برای بخش مواد غذایی کشاورزی. مجله پژوهش های راهبردی در علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی. 8(2). 187-202.
References
 
Afum, E., Osei-Ahenkan, V. Y., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Owusu, J. A., Kusi, L. Y., & Ankomah, J. (2020). Green manufacturing practices and sustainable performance among Ghanaian manufacturing SMEs: The explanatory link of green supply chain integration. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 31(6), 1457–1475.
Ajalli, M. (2024a). Conceptual modeling of determining factors in the assessment of sustainability and resilience of the supply chain: a study of rubber industry suppliers in Iran. J Rubber Res 27, 259–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42464-024-00257-3.
Ajalli, M. (2024b). A Fuzzy Delphi-BWM-TOPSIS Hybrid Approach to Assessment Suppliers Resilience. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Studies, 11(1), 181-195. doi: 10.22116/jiems.2024.472125.1571. (In Persian)
Ajalli, M. (2025a). A Combined Decision System for Critical Success Factors and Influential Parts of Blockchain Technology. Iran J Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40995-025-01844-8.
Ajalli, M. (2025b). Assessing of Green Suppliers in Applying Blockchain with Fuzzy Delphi-MOORA Hybrid Approach. Quarterly journal of Industrial Technology Development, 23(61), 37-54. doi: 10.22034/jtd.2024.2037386.1949.
Ajalli, M. (2025c). A hybrid approach of CFA-FAHP-SWARA-ARAS for evaluating the readiness criteria of zinc industry green suppliers in blockchain technology adopting, Results in Engineering, Volume 27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2025.106034.
Ajalli, M. (2025d). Evaluation of key cement production industries based on sustainable development factors with a combined approach of Fuzzy (AHP-VIKOR). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Studies, 12(1), 1-13. doi: 10.22116/jiems.2024.474464.1572.
Ajalli, M. Soleiman Ekhtiyari, N. Zandi, P. (2025e). A Combined of Path Analysis-MCDM Approaches to Evaluation of Leagile Suppliers IJIEPR; 36 (2): 116-129 URL: http://ijiepr.iust.ac.ir/article-1-2153-en.html.
Ajalli, M., Azimi, H., Mohammadi Balani, A., & Rezaei, M. (2017). Application of Fuzzy AHP and COPRAS to Solve the Supplier Selection Problems, International Journal of Supply Chain Management. 6(3), 112-119.
Ajalli, M., Nasisri, A. and Hedayati, H. (2021b). Effect of GSCM on Environmental Collaboration and Sustainability Performance Using Factors Analysis and Decision Making Techniques. Environment and Interdisciplinary Development, 6(74), 60-77. doi: 10.22034/envj.2022.309177.1147. (In Persian)
Ajalli, M., Saberifard, N., Zinati, B. (2021a). Evaluation and Ranking the Resilient Suppliers with the Combination of Decision Making Techniques, Management and Production Engineering Review, Volume 12, Number 3, September, pp. 129–140, DOI: 10.24425/mper.2021.137685.
Ajalli, M., Zinati, B. and Saberifard, N. (2022). Ranking of Pure Suppliers with Additive Ratio Assessment Technique (Case Study: vehicle manufacturing industry). Logistics Thought, 21(81), 71-94. doi: 10.22034/lot.2022.1266439.1171. (In Persian)
Anam, M.Z., Bari, A.M., Paul, S.K., Ali, S.M., Kabir, G., (2022). Modelling the drivers of solar energy development in an emerging economy: Implications for sustainable development goals, Res. Conserv. Recycl. Adv. 13, 200068.
Arscot, L. (2004). Sustainable development in the oil and gas Industry. J Energy Resour Technol; 126(1):1–5.
Baah, C., Opoku-Agyeman, D., Acquah, I. S. K., Agyabeng-Mensah, Y., Afum, E., Faibil, D., et al. (2021). Examining the correlations between stakeholder pressures, green production practices, firm reputation, environmental and financial performance: Evidence from manufacturing SMEs. In Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27 pp. 100–114).
Bagheri, A, Hjorth, P. (2007). A framework for process indicators to monitor for sustainable development: practice to an urban water system. Environ Dev Sustain; 9:143–61.
Blasco-Blasco, O., Pinto-Delacadena, P.A., Vinueza-Cabezas, A. et al. (2025). Crafting a competency-based questionnaire based on Fuzzy Delphi: a proposal for enhanced hiring process. Qual Quant 59, 3245–3269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02086-x.
Calleo, Y., Pilla, F. (2023). Delphi-based future scenarios: a bibliometric analysis of climate change case studies. Futures, 149, 103143.
Cao, W., Huang, Y. & Zhang, H. (2025). Screen chaotic motion by Shannon entropy in curved spacetimes. Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 568. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14310-x
Elahi, M., Enayati. R., Keramatpour, M. (2025).  A fuzzy Delphi-SERVQUAL model using degree of belief structure for assessing customer satisfaction in automotive after-sales services, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 184, Part B, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113770.
Galli, A. et al. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “footprint family” of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol. Ind. 16, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.017.
Greenland, S., Levin, E., Dalrymple, J.F., O’Mahony, B., (2019). Sustainable innovation adoption barriers: water sustainability, food production and drip irrigation in Australia, Soc. Responsib. J. 15 (6), 727–741.
Gunasekaran, A. et al. (2017). Big data and predictive analytics for supply chain and organizational performance. J. Bus. Res. 70, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.08.004.
Gupta, H., Barua, M.K. (2018). A framework to overcome barriers to green innovation in SMEs using BWM and Fuzzy TOPSIS, Sci. Total Environ. 633, 122–139.
Gupta, N., Garg, P., Ahuja, N. (2025b). An integrated pythagorean fuzzy delphi-AHP-CoCoSo approach for exploring barriers and mitigation strategies for sustainable supply chain in the food industry, Supply Chain Analytics, Volume 10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sca.2025.100105.
Gupta, P., Sharma, Y., Chauhan, A. et al. (2025a). Investigation of green supply chain management practices and sustainability in Indian manufacturing enterprises using a structural equation modelling approach. Sci Rep 15, 14909. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95940-9.
Hajiagha, S.H.R.; Hashemi, S.S.; Zavadskas, E.K. (2013). A complex proportional assessment method for group decision making in an interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ., 19, 22–37.
Hart. S., Milstein. MB. (2003). Creating sustainable value, Academy of Management Executive. 17(2); p. 56–69.
Heinberg, R. (2007). Peak everything; waking up to the century of declines. Canada: New Society Publishers.
Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, F., Allahviranloo, T., Pedrycz, W., Shahriari, M., Sharafi, H., Razipour GhalehJough, S. (2023). The Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) in Uncertainty Environment. In: Fuzzy Decision Analysis: Multi Attribute Decision Making Approach. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1121. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44742-6_12.
Ibrahim, H.A., Zaidan, A.A., Qahtan, S., Zaidan, B.B. (2023). Sustainability assessment of palm oil industry 4.0 technologies in a circular economy applications based on interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy rough set-FWZIC and EDAS methods, Applied Soft Computing, Volume 136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110073.
Karmaker, C.L., Aziz, R.A., Palit, T., Bari, A.M. (2022). Analyzing supply chain risk factors in the small and medium enterprises under fuzzy environment: implications towards sustainability for emerging economies, Sustain. Technol. Entrep. 100032.
Li, X., Li, Y., Li, G. et al. (2025). Sustainable supply chain management practices and performance: The moderating effect of stakeholder pressure. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 12, 336. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04676-4.
Liu, P., & Shen, J. (2024). GHF-COPRAS Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Method Based on Cumulative Prospect Theory and Its Application to Enterprise Digital Asset Valuation. Axioms, 13(5), 297. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms13050297.
Mousavi-Nasab, S.H., Sotoudeh-Anvari, A. (2017). A comprehensive MCDM-based approach using TOPSIS, COPRAS and DEA as an auxiliary tool for material selection problems, Materials & Design, Volume 121, Pages 237-253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.02.041.
Mugoni, E., Kanyepe, J., Tukuta, M. (2024). Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices (SSCMPS) and environmental performance: A systematic review, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, Volume 3, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100050.
Mugoni, E., Kanyepe, J., Tukuta, M. (2024). Sustainable Supply Chain Management Practices (SSCMPS) and environmental performance: A systematic review, Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, Volume 3, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stae.2023.100050.
Naresh Babu, M., Anandan, V. & Muthukrishnan, N. (2019). Analysis of EN24 steel in turning process with copper nanofluids under minimum quantity lubrication. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 41, 101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-019-1606-1.
Osorio, LAR. Lobato, MO., Castillo, XAD. (2005). Debates on sustainable development: towards a holistic view of reality. Environ Dev Sustain; 7:501.
Pereira, M., Hendry, LC. Silva, ME. Bossle, MB. Antonialli, LM (2023), "Sustainable supply chain management in a global context: the perspective of emerging economy suppliers". RAUSP Management Journal, Vol. 58 No. 3 pp. 197–218, doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-05-2022-0141.
Rahim, M., Akhtar, Y., Yang, M. -S., Ali, H. E. M. and Elhag, A. A., (2024). Improved COPRAS Method With Unknown Weights Under p, q-Quasirung Orthopair Fuzzy Environment: Application to Green Supplier Selection," in IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 69783-69795,, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3400016. keywords: {Green products; Decision making; Sustainable development; Companies; Supply chains; Business; Uncertainty; Social factors; Ecology; Product delivery; p, q–quasirung orthopair fuzzy sets; COPRAS method; MCGDM; green supplier selection}.
Rahman, M.M., Bari, A.M., Ali, S.M., Taghipour, A. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection in the textile dyeing industry: an integrated multi-criteria decision analytics approach, Res., Conserv. Recycl. Adv., 200117.
Raut, R.D., Narkhede, B., Gardas, B.B. (2017). To identify the critical success factors of sustainable supply chain management practices in the context of oil and gas industries: ISM approach, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 68, Part 1, Pages 33-47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.067.
Sairaj, B. Patil, Tushar, A. Patole, Rasika, S. Jadhav, Shruti, S. Suryawanshi, Sunil, J. Raykar, (2022). Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) based Multiple-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) paradigm for hard turning process parameters, Materials Today: Proceedings, Volume 59, Part 1, Pages 835-840, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.142.
Saki Malehi, E., Ashrafi, S. M., & Ghafouri, H. R. (2022). Performance evaluation of using Shannon’s entropy crossing time to monitor drought: a case study of the Karkheh. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 67(13), 1971–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2022.2116981.
Saraiva, P., (2023). On Shannon entropy and its applications, Kuwait Journal of Science, Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 194-199, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjs.2023.05.004.
Seitz, MA, Wells, PE. (2006). Challenging the implementation of corporate sustainability. Bus Process Manag J; 12(6), [822-36].
Sharma, H., Sohani, N., & Yadav, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of ranking the lean supply chain enablers: An AHP, BWM and fuzzy SWARA based approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management.
Shekarian, E.; Ijadi, B.; Zare, A.; Majava, J. (2022). Sustainable Supply Chain Management: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Industrial Practices. Sustainability, 14, 7892. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14137892.
Walker, H. & Preuss, L. (2008). Fostering sustainability through sourcing from small businesses: Public sector perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 16(15), 1600–1609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.014.
 
دوره 3، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 9
مقالات پژوهشی
تابستان 1405
صفحه 99-126

  • تاریخ دریافت 10 آذر 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 10 دی 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 20 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ انتشار 01 مرداد 1405